Dani Rodrik, former Economist devotee, opens things up:
But then I realized that the more I knew about a subject, the less The Economist was making sense. Its one thing to be opinionated, another to be misinformed and arrogant at the same time.Chris Blattman, another former Economist-lover, says Amen:
Dani puts his finger on the true cause: the more I knew about a subject (development, Africa, civil wars, etc.) the more I shuddered to read the thing. I often have the same complaint with coverage in other news sources, but Dani hits on something especially vexing: the high-falootin tone.Henry from Crooked Timber, who I guess is a political scientist, joins the pile-on:
The Economist flatters readers who aren’t quite intelligent enough to realize how shallow it is into thinking that they are more intelligent than they are because they read it.YouNotSneaky provides a helpful guide on how to read the magazine. The comments are good too.
No comments:
Post a Comment